“If corporations pay today, the poor pay tomorrow — with higher prices and shorter lives.”
- adaptationguide.com
San Francisco files landmark lawsuit against companies over ultra processed foods
**San Francisco’s Lawsuit Against Junk Food Giants:
A War That Might Cost Us All — Later**
Let’s get one thing straight: San Francisco’s City Attorney David Chiu is taking a big swing at the food industry — and he’s not pulling punches. He’s accusing the American mega-food corporations of knowingly addicting the population to ultra-processed garbage. They made us sick with beautiful packaging and predatory marketing, and now the public is expected to foot the trillions-of-dollars healthcare bill.
So he’s suing ten multinational giants — Coca-Cola, Mars, Kraft Heinz… yes, even Nestlé — claiming San Francisco deserves financial justice and a precedent that could help communities across the country.
The stock prices immediately dipped.
The legal firms helping the city smell money.
And somewhere in America, a diabetes ward is wondering why the ICU is overflowing.
Sounds righteous, doesn’t it?
But here’s where this crusade gets dangerous.
Because the science behind “ultra-processed food” is still a mess.
We KNOW junk food is a slow-rolling health disaster.
But there is no globally accepted definition of what “ultra-processed” even means.
The classification most lawsuits rely on — NOVA — is vague, philosophical, and infuriatingly inconsistent:
🥤 Is a diet soda ultra-processed?
🥫 Is canned soup? Granola bars? Vegan meat?
☕ What about instant coffee?
A Snickers bar might be harmful — fine. But removing fat and sugar completely can also harm the body. Cause and effect in nutrition is a statistical forest fire, not a smoking gun.
Who or what gave someone diabetes — the breakfast Frosted Flakes?
The daily candy bar?
Or the economic system that makes junk cheaper than apples?
Try proving that in court.
San Francisco wants a “tobacco-style” jackpot. But this isn’t cigarettes.
The city loves comparing its lawsuit to the 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement —
$200 BILLION paid out because cigarettes undeniably cause cancer and companies undeniably lied.
But nutrition is not smoking.
Cigarettes have one job: kill consumers slowly so they keep buying them.
Food? Well… you need it to not die today.
This case risks setting a legal precedent built on scientific sand.
A shaky victory could:
• Invite thousands of new lawsuits
• Create massive legal uncertainty for EVERY food business
• Jack up insurance costs
• Jack up FOOD prices for the public
When mega-corporations pay, WE pay later.
Every. Single. Time.
And the U.S. legal system loves a lottery moment.
Bayer — after buying Monsanto — learned this the hard way. Roundup lawsuits ripped $11 billion out of the company. Despite:
• EPA says glyphosate isn’t dangerous
• WHO says it might be
• The product is still legally sold nationwide
The scientific chaos didn’t matter.
Juries smelled harm, and someone had to bleed.
This legal gaming even has a name now: social inflation —
A skyrocketing jackpot culture where clever lawyers and a few plaintiffs get rich, and everybody else pays higher prices through inflated insurance premiums.
You know who warned about this?
Swiss Re — a global reinsurance giant — saying obesity could become the NEXT goldmine for the litigation industry.
San Francisco’s lawsuit is the first swing of that shovel.
But here’s the brutal truth no one wants to say:
Food companies didn’t raise our kids.
Advertising didn’t cook our dinners.
The corporations didn’t lock fruit behind a paywall.
Governments did.
We built an economy where:
✔ High-calorie, nutrient-dead, addictive sludge is cheaper than real food
✔ Nutrition education is optional and outdated
✔ School lunches are factory-processed Franken-meals
✔ Healthy eating is a privilege of the wealthy
✔ Profit is the god of the American food system
We point a shaky finger at Big Food, but we let the system collapse.
We banned cigarettes from schools but we still sell sugar-loaded poison there at lunch.
That’s hypocrisy — not justice.
The Real Fight Should Start at Home.
We do not sue our way into health.
We educate, regulate, and subsidize our way into health.
It has to start with:
🏠 Parents — the first nutrition teachers
📚 Schools — real food programs, not vending machines
🏛 Government — supporting healthy produce, not corn syrup and corporate tax shields
💪 Communities — making fresh food accessible everywhere, not just in rich ZIP codes
Want to stop diabetes?
Start before the courtroom.
Start before the hospital.
Start before the grocery aisle.
San Francisco may win a pile of cash… and still lose the war.
A successful lawsuit might punish Big Food.
But if prices rise and access to good nutrition worsens, who suffers?
Not the CEOs.
Not the shareholders.
The same people already trapped in the food poverty cycle.
David Chiu’s anger is righteous.
His target is seductive.
But his battlefield is flawed.
If we allow the courts to define what food is, and who is to blame for disease…
we’re not protecting the people.
We’re feeding them to the wolves.
Here’s the ultimate scandal:
If Big Food loses —
we all pay later.
If Big Food wins —
we keep paying anyway.
The cycle doesn’t break until we stop asking the legal system to fix health problems that only policy, education, and access ever could.
San Francisco wants a precedent.
America needs a revolution.
yours truly,
Adaptation-Guide
