“You can shred regulations, muzzle scientists, and bury reports in locked drawers — but you cannot negotiate with physics. The atmosphere keeps receipts. Every ton of carbon is a signature. Every flood is an invoice. Every wildfire is a foreclosure notice on the American Dream.”
- adaptationguide.com
PART III
Insurance, Affordability, and the Dome We Actually Need
Let’s get practical.
Climate deregulation hits households first.
1. Insurance
Premiums are exploding in:
Fire zones.
Floodplains.
Hurricane corridors.
Major insurers are withdrawing from entire states.
When insurance becomes unaffordable:
Mortgages fail.
Property values drop.
Tax bases erode.
Climate risk becomes housing risk.
2. Vehicle Standards
Claims of $2,400 savings per vehicle deserve scrutiny:
Gas price assumptions matter.
Battery prices are falling globally.
Tariffs complicate cost projections.
Automakers are already pivoting internationally.
Rolling back standards does not freeze global innovation.
It just risks leaving U.S. consumers behind.
3. Public Health
Greenhouse gases intensify:
Heat stroke risk.
Vector-borne disease.
Air quality degradation.
Disaster mortality.
Pollution is not partisan.
Asthma is not partisan.
Floodwater is not partisan.
The “Build a Dome” Irony
If greenhouse gases are not a problem in the U.S., then we need a dome — right?
Because air crosses borders.
Carbon dioxide mixes globally within months.
Methane circulates hemispherically.
There is no atmospheric nationalism.
If anything, repealing climate authority means:
The U.S. exports instability.
Neighbors absorb consequences.
Global cooperation weakens.
Canada, Mexico, island nations — they don’t get to opt out of U.S. emissions.
Physics is multilateral.
“Why Govern Like There Is No Tomorrow?”
That question deserves seriousness, not slogans.
Possible drivers:
Electoral time horizons (2–4 years).
Investor quarterly cycles.
Ideological hostility to regulation.
Cultural polarization.
Belief in adaptation over mitigation.
Strategic doubt-casting to delay transition.
But here is the hard line:
Even if you believe mitigation is limited…
Insurance markets believe in risk.
The Pentagon believes in risk.
Central banks believe in risk.
Reinsurers believe in risk.
Capital is already adapting.
The question is whether public policy will.
The Rubicon Moment
Repealing the Endangerment Finding is not just another rule rollback.
It challenges:
The authority of scientific consensus.
The Supreme Court’s prior interpretation.
The regulatory basis for national climate action.
You can debate tax rates.
You cannot debate radiative transfer into nonexistence.
The Earth system does not negotiate.
Final Word: Big Truth vs Big Lie
This is not about hysteria.
It is about accountability.
If leaders believe climate change is manageable without regulation, they should present:
Peer-reviewed data.
Transparent economic modeling.
Clear adaptation plans.
Insurance stability strategies.
Infrastructure resilience funding.
If not, then this is not policy realism.
It is deferral.
And deferral compounds risk.
They can repeal a rule.
They cannot repeal science.
And markets, insurers, farmers, firefighters, coastal homeowners, and future voters will eventually render the verdict.
yours truly,
Adaptation-Guide
No comments:
Post a Comment