"It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right."
— Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience (1849)
Watson didn’t respect the law that protected poachers. He respected the whales.
And history tends to remember those who chose right over legal.
Interpol has been weaponized, Sea Shepherd founder Paul Watson says • FRANCE 24
By | Adaptation-Guide |
“A small justice victory for me, a major justice victory for the whale.”
— Captain Paul Watson
Let’s get this straight:
Paul Watson, the legendary environmental activist and co-founder of Sea Shepherd, has just been removed from Interpol’s Red Notice list.
After 14 years of being hunted across oceans like the very whales he defends, Interpol now admits what most of us already knew — this was a politically motivated stunt.
A witch hunt. But here’s the real question no one in power wants to ask:
Why was Paul Watson ever on a most-wanted list… while Japan continues to kill endangered whales in a designated sanctuary with impunity?
That’s not rhetorical. Really. Why?
The Real Criminals Are in Suits, Not Wet Suits
Watson allegedly obstructed a Japanese whaling vessel’s "official duties" — duties which, let’s not forget, involve illegally slaughtering whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. Let me repeat that for the back row:
Japan has been killing whales in a sanctuary. A protected zone. A place designated for species recovery.
That’s not civil disobedience. That’s state-sponsored ecological crime.
And yet, Japan has the gall to issue an international warrant through Interpol for the man trying to stop them?
The Hypocrisy of the G7: Where Were Canada and Japan?
Canada and Japan are both G7 members — supposedly the world’s democratic champions, leaders of global cooperation, guardians of rule-based order.
But when Watson, a dual Canadian-American citizen, was targeted by Japan's authoritarian-style vendetta for disrupting their barbaric slaughter, where was Canada?
Nowhere.
And where was Japan’s diplomacy when Watson sat in jail in Greenland for five months?
Still lobbying Interpol to keep him flagged while whales bled out on their decks.
Apparently, whale murder is fine, but getting in the way of whale murder is criminal.
Let's Call This What It Is: Eco-Persecution
What we’re witnessing is not justice. It’s selective enforcement.
It’s the criminalization of conservation.
It’s Interpol being used as a tool of political harassment.
It’s global law enforcement spending decades pursuing a man who threw stink bombs at a ship while letting entire species drift toward extinction.
Interpol’s own commission now acknowledges that the “disproportionate nature of the charges” and the “political elements around the case” may have tainted the red notice.
Other countries — beyond Denmark — refused to extradite him. That’s not silence. That’s a silent protest from the legal world.
Meanwhile, Sea Shepherd exposed Japan’s whaling for what it is: profit-driven butchery dressed up as "scientific research."
An excuse so laughable the International Court of Justice ruled against it in 2014 — and Japan simply withdrew from the IWC to keep killing.
You know what that’s called in any other context?
A rogue state violating international norms.
So, Who Should Really Be on Trial?
Paul Watson may be a controversial figure. He’s confrontational. He breaks the rules. He’s not always polite. But if protecting life in a marine sanctuary makes you a fugitive, we need to redefine the word "criminal."
Why isn't the Japanese Fisheries Agency on trial at The Hague?
Why isn’t there a red notice for the ship captains gutting whales in protected waters?
Why does the world tolerate this silence — and even fund it via G7 diplomacy?
Final Thought: The World’s Tired of Cowardly Politics
If Canada had any spine, it would have intervened on behalf of one of its own citizens years ago.
If Japan had any credibility, it would admit its whaling operations are commercial, not scientific.
And if the G7 wants to preserve any shred of moral high ground, it needs to stop punishing environmentalists like terrorists while turning a blind eye to real ecological destruction.
So let me ask it again — not as a blogger, not as an activist, but as a human being:
Why is killing whales legal, but stopping the killing makes you a fugitive?
You tell me.
Sources:
Join the fight:
✍️ [Write to your MP or representative about ending whaling subsidies]
📢 [Share this blog and speak up for the voiceless]
Because the next time they come for the whales — or for the ones who defend them — it shouldn’t be in silence.
yours truly,
No comments:
Post a Comment